Hellfish, lets have a look into your "argument":
H311fi5h wrote:Those haters one their crusade against premium ammo and all who use it are more annoying than Jehovah's Witnesses and missionary vegans combined. Everytime I have to read "gold noob" or anything in chat I just want to punch you in the face.
Complain about WG all you want but let the rest of us play our game in peace.
Here you clearly want criticism not directed your way (it's easy to accept criticism as long as it is not directed your way, so let's only talk about that). "Let us play our game in peace" means not being disturbed by criticism, right?
H311fi5h wrote:And there is no hostility against criticism but against unsound arguments
So there kinda is a hostility against criticism. Let's suppose there weren't and it's about unsound arguments. What exactly is unsound about my arguments? Please go into specifics.
H311fi5h wrote:and the virtually religious mania to force their way of playing the game on others shown by the opposers of premium ammunition.
Now this is what is called paranoid. You put me into a line with non-thinking random bobs. And how does this "virtually religious mania" exactly look like? Because some are worshipping non-premium ammo? How'd you call yourself then, worshipping affirmation? I'm not worshipping anything btw, I think I've made some sound arguments actually and even distinguished sophisticated. And now: "force their way"... how exactly would I do that? I am not forcing anyone but no one can stop me from criticizing. And that is all I am doing. You seem to believe that criticism and forcing are the same. And that is the exact point I wrote that polemics about the national anthem. It was a pure exaggeration to make a point. Which you just proved to be necessary.
H311fi5h wrote:You are entitled to your opinion - doesn't mean I'm not allowed to think it's idiotic.
Thank you, that is very kind of you. Why the fuck would I need your entitlement?
H311fi5h wrote:Please read up on the history of the german anthem before you claim such bullshit. The text is from a time when there was no germany, but a bunch of loosely connected smaller states.
Oh boy. Two things: German nationalism did not evolve 1990 nor 1945 nor 1918 nor 1871. The idea of a modern german state evolved probably somewhen around 1800 in the times of Romantic. Already back then there have been certain ideas that were considered to be german; those ideas were obviously different from the ones in France or America. And I claim that that is no coincidence. So basically the ideas that were taken into the national anthem are kinda constituting for a german nationalism and I'd argue that they still manifest in german reality. For example in the hatred against criticism that is correlated with anti-intellectualism. German nationalism has always been very, well, specific and differed from more liberal states. That's why I wrote "typical german". And those specifics manifest in the national anthem e.g. So secondly, even though the german national anthem evolved around 1840 or parts of it even earlier, it still means something that the modern federal republic hasn't changed those words, don't you think? Why would you choose words you don't connect to any longer?
If you honour my words and efforts of arguing with only oneliners like "that is bullshit", I'm gonna kick you in your balls. Have at least the decency to make an argument at all instead of only accusing others to be unsound.